There is no “best place” to buy a home.
But the number crunchers at WalletHub put some math behind what’s largely an emotional debate, ranking 300 U.S. cities on their housing market’s real estate qualities (80% of the final score) and the community’s economics, such as affordability and jobs (the remaining 20%).
Read more Different types of 9/11 memorials across the U.S. all have heartfelt meaning
My trusty spreadsheet extracted the grades for the 52 Southern California cities in the report to see the winners and losers. Remember, these are WalletHub’s calculations involving 17 metrics. Like any “best places” scorecard, they’re more fodder for thought than major scientific proof.
Still, who doesn’t like a good real estate debate? And according to these calculations, Southern California’s best is a city that ranks high on many “best places” lists – Irvine.
How? The Orange County city was ranked as having the region’s best real estate conditions and was scored sixth-best in local economics. And by the way, Irvine was 10th-best on WalletHub’s overall national ranking.
Top grades
Note that nine of the remaining members of Southern California’s top 10 are from the Inland Empire or San Diego County. In order of local ranking …
– Ontario: No. 2 for real estate, No. 5 in economics and No. 34 nationally.
– Murrieta: No. 6 for real estate, No. 4 in economics and No. 58 nationally.
– San Diego: No. 4 for real estate, No. 23 in economics and No. 70 nationally.
– Chula Vista: No. 5 for real estate, No. 15 in economics and No. 75 nationally.
– Vista: No. 3 for real estate, No. 32 in economics and No. 76 nationally.
– Carlsbad: No. 7 for real estate, No. 24 in economics and No. 85 nationally.
– Rancho Cucamonga: No. 16 for real estate, No. 8 in economics and No. 91 nationally.
– Escondido: No. 8 for real estate, No. 30 in economics and No. 100 nationally.
– Garden Grove: No. 10 for real estate, No. 31 in economics and No. 112 nationally.
The bottom 10
Palmdale’s housing market got Southern California’s worst grade.
The Los Angeles County city ranked last among the 52 cities for real estate but scored 21st for local economics. And nationally, its overall grade ranks ninth-worst among 300 cities.
Note that eight other L.A. cities were also in the bottom 10. Here’s the lowly ranked, from second-lowest score through 10th-lowest:
Read more Wall Street mixed in early trading while oil prices push higher yet again
– Lancaster: No. 51 of 52 local cities for real estate qualities, No. 20 in economics and No. 291 of 300 nationally.
– Victorville: No. 50 for real estate, No. 1 in economics and No. 277 nationally.
– Inglewood: No. 45 for real estate, No. 52 in economics and No. 267 nationally.
– Compton: No. 47 for real estate, No. 44 in economics and No. 260 nationally.
– Santa Clarita: No. 49 for real estate, No. 12 in economics and No. 256 nationally.
– Downey: No. 41 for real estate, No. 39 in economics and No. 239 nationally.
– South Gate: No. 39 for real estate, No. 43 in economics and No. 238 nationally.
– Los Angeles: No. 33 for real estate, No. 50 in economics and No. 237 nationally.
– San Bernardino: No. 46 for real estate, No. 13 in economics and No. 229 nationally.
Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at [email protected]
Read more What to know about Canada’s escalating trade war with the US as Carney retaliates with tariffs
- Try Jonathan Lansner’s Substack collection of economic trends. CLICK HERE!